Home  ›  How Do Affect and Empathy Function in Environmental Art?

How Do Affect and Empathy Function in Environmental Art?

Written By Tuesday, April 26, 2022 Add Comment Edit

Differences in the mental functions and behaviors of the sexes

Sex activity differences in psychology are differences in the mental functions and behaviors of the sexes and are due to a circuitous interplay of biological, developmental, and cultural factors. Differences have been plant in a variety of fields such as mental health, cognitive abilities, personality, emotion, sexuality, and tendency towards assailment. Such variation may be innate, learned, or both. Modern research attempts to distinguish between these causes and to analyze any ethical concerns raised. Since behavior is a result of interactions between nature and nurture, researchers are interested in investigating how biology and environment interact to produce such differences,[ane] [2] although this is oft not possible.[2] : 36

A number of factors combine to influence the development of sex activity differences, including genetics and epigenetics;[three] differences in encephalon construction and function;[4] hormones,[5] and socialization.[1] [2] [6] [ page needed ]

The formation of gender is controversial in many scientific fields, including psychology. Specifically, researchers and theorists take dissimilar perspectives on how much of gender is due to biological, neurochemical, and evolutionary factors (nature), or is the issue of civilization and socialization (nurture). This is known every bit the nature versus nurture fence.

Definition [edit]

Psychological sex activity differences refer to emotional, motivational, or cognitive differences between the sexes.[7] [6] Examples include greater male tendencies toward violence,[eight] or greater female empathy.

The terms "sex differences" and "gender differences" are at times used interchangeably, sometimes to refer to differences in male person and female behaviors as either biological ("sexual activity differences") or environmental/cultural ("gender differences").[ii] : 35–36 This distinction is often difficult to brand due to challenges in determining whether a difference is biological or environmental/cultural.[2]

Gender is generally conceived as a set up of characteristics or traits that are associated with a sure biological sexual activity (male or female). The characteristics that generally define gender are referred to as masculine or feminine. In some cultures, gender is not always conceived equally binary, or strictly linked to biological sex activity. Every bit a result, in some cultures at that place are tertiary, quaternary,[9] or "some"[10] : 23 genders.

History [edit]

Beliefs about sex differences have probable existed throughout history.[2] : 2

In his 1859 book On the Origin of Species, Charles Darwin proposed that, like physical traits, psychological traits evolve through the process of sexual selection:[ verification needed ]

In the afar future I encounter open fields for far more important researches. Psychology will be based on a new foundation, that of the necessary acquirement of each mental ability and capacity by gradation.

—Charles Darwin, The Origin of Species, 1859, p. 449.

Two of his later books, The Descent of Man, and Selection in Relation to Sex (1871) and The Expression of the Emotions in Homo and Animals (1872) explore the subject of psychological differences between the sexes. The Descent of Man and Selection in Relation to Sex includes seventy pages on sexual selection in homo evolution, some of which concerns psychological traits.[eleven]

The written report of gender took off in the 1970s. During this time period, academic works were published reflecting the changing views of researchers towards gender studies. Some of these works included textbooks, every bit they were an of import way that information was compiled and made sense of the new field. In 1978 Women and sexual practice roles: A social psychological perspective was published, one of the starting time textbooks on the psychology behind women and sex roles.[12] Another textbook to be published, Gender and Communication, was the offset textbook to discuss the topic of its subject.[thirteen]

Other influential academic works focused on the development of gender. In 1966, The Development of Sex activity Differences was published. This book went into what factors influence a child'southward gender evolution, with contributors proposing the furnishings of hormones, social learning, and cognitive development in respective chapters. Man and Woman, Male child and Daughter, by John Money was published in 1972, reporting findings of research done with intersex subjects. The book proposed that the social environs a child grows up in is more important in determining gender than the genetic factors he or she inherits. The majority of Money's theories regarding the importance of socialization in the conclusion of gender have come under intense criticism, especially in connectedness with the imitation reporting of success in the 'John/Joan' experiment (meet David Reimer).[14]

In 1974, The Psychology of Sex Differences was published. It said that men and women acquit more than similarly than had been previously supposed. They too proposed that children have much power over what gender role they abound into, whether by choosing which parent to imitate, or doing activities such as playing with action figures or dolls.[12] These works added new noesis to the field of gender psychology.

Psychological traits [edit]

Personality traits [edit]

Cross-cultural research has shown population-level gender differences on the tests measuring sociability and emotionality. For example, on the scales measured by the Large Five personality traits women consistently report higher neuroticism, agreeableness, warmth and openness to feelings, and men oft report higher assertiveness and openness to ideas.[fifteen] Nevertheless, there is significant overlap in all these traits, then an private adult female may, for example, have lower neuroticism than the majority of men.[16] Contrary to evolutionary theories of personality, which would result in stable differences across cultures, the size of the differences varied between cultures.[15]

Across cultures, gender differences in personality traits are largest in prosperous, salubrious, and egalitarian cultures in which women have more than opportunities that are equal to those of men.[17] Differences in the magnitude of sex differences betwixt more or less adult world regions were due to differences between men, not women, in these respective regions.[17] That is, men in highly developed world regions were less neurotic, extroverted, careful and agreeable compared to men in less developed world regions. Women, on the other hand tended not to differ in personality traits across regions.[17] [17]

A personality trait directly linked to emotion and empathy where gender differences exist (see below) is scored on the Machiavellianism scale. Individuals who score loftier on this dimension are emotionally cool; this allows them to disassemble from others likewise as values, and human activity egoistically rather than driven by bear on, empathy or morality. In large samples of Us college students, males are on average more Machiavellian than females; in particular, males are over-represented among very high Machiavellians, while females are overrepresented amongst depression Machiavellians.[eighteen] A 2014 meta-analysis by researchers Rebecca Friesdorf and Paul Conway found that men score significantly college on narcissism than women and this finding is robust across past literature.[19] The meta-analysis included 355 studies measuring narcissism across participants from the United states, Germany, China, Netherlands, Italia, United kingdom, Hong Kong, Singapore, Switzerland, Norway, Sweden, Australia and Belgium as well as measuring latent factors from 124 additional studies.[19] The researchers noted that gender differences in narcissism is not only a measurement antiquity just also represents truthful differences in the latent personality traits such every bit men's heightened sense of entitlement and authorisation.[19]

Males on average are more assertive and have higher self-esteem. Females were on average college than males in extraversion, anxiety, trust, and, especially, tender-mindedness (eastward.k., nurturance).[twenty]

Men adopt working with things, and women prefer working with people. When interests were classified by RIASEC type Holland Codes (Realistic, Investigative, Artistic, Social, Enterprising, Conventional), men showed stronger Realistic and Investigative interests, and women showed stronger Artistic, Social, and Conventional interests. Sex differences favoring men were also institute for more specific measures of engineering, science, and mathematics interests.[21]

Emotion [edit]

When measured with an affect intensity measure, women reported greater intensity of both positive and negative bear on than men. Women besides reported a more than intense and more frequent experience of affect, joy, and love but also experienced more than embarrassment, guilt, shame, sadness, anger, fearfulness, and distress. Experiencing pride was more frequent and intense for men than for women.[22] [ folio needed ] In imagined frightening situations, such as beingness home alone and witnessing a stranger walking towards your house, women reported greater fearfulness. Women besides reported more than fear in situations that involved "a male person'due south hostile and aggressive behavior".[22] : 281 Emotional contamination refers to the phenomenon of a person'southward emotions becoming similar to those of surrounding people. Women have been reported to be more than responsive to this.[23]

In that location are documented differences in socialization that could contribute to sex activity differences in emotion and to differences in patterns of brain action.[ citation needed ]

Context also determines a man or woman's emotional behavior. Context-based emotion norms, such as feeling rules or display rules, "prescribe emotional feel and expressions in specific situations similar a nuptials or a funeral", may be independent of the person's gender. In situations similar a wedding ceremony or a funeral, the activated emotion norms utilise to and constrain every person in the situation. Gender differences are more pronounced when situational demands are very pocket-sized or non-existent as well as in ambiguous situations. During these situations, gender norms "are the default option that prescribes emotional behavior".[22] : 290–1

Professor of Psychology Ann Kring said[ when? ], "Information technology is wrong to brand a blanket statement that women are more emotional than men, information technology is correct to say that women show their emotions more than men." In two studies by Kring, women were constitute to be more facially expressive than men when it came to both positive and negative emotions. These researchers concluded that women and men experience the same corporeality of emotion, only that women are more likely to express their emotions.[24] [ ameliorate source needed ]

Women are known to have anatomically differently shaped tear glands than men as well as having more of the hormone prolactin, which is nowadays in tear glands, as adults. While girls and boys weep at roughly the same amount at historic period 12, by age 18, women generally cry four times more than men, which could be explained by higher levels of prolactin.[25]

Empathy [edit]

Electric current literature find that women demonstrate more empathy across studies.[26] Women perform better than men in tests involving emotional estimation, such as understanding facial expressions, and empathy.[27] [28] [29] [thirty]

Some studies argue that this is related to the subject'southward perceived gender identity and gendered expectations influencing the subject'southward implicit gender stereotypes.[31] Additionally, culture impacts gender differences in the expression of emotions. This may be explained by the different social roles women and men have in different cultures, and past the status and power men and women hold in unlike societies, equally well as the different cultural values various societies agree.[22] [ page needed ] Some studies accept establish no differences in empathy between women and men, and advise that perceived gender differences are the outcome of motivational differences.[32] Some researchers argue that because differences in empathy disappear on tests where information technology is not clear that empathy is being studied, men and women do not differ in ability, but instead in how empathetic they would similar to appear to themselves and others.[31]

Women are better at recognizing facial effects, expression processing and emotions in full general.[33] Men were merely better at recognizing specific behaviour which includes acrimony, assailment and threatening cues.[33] Small merely statistically meaning sexual practice differences favour females in "Reading of the mind" test. "Reading of the mind" test is an power measure of theory of mind or cognitive empathy.[34] Overall, females have an reward in not-exact emotional recognition.[35]

At that place are some sex differences in empathy from nascency which remains consistent and stable across lifespan.[26] Females were found to take higher empathy than males while children with higher empathy regardless of gender continue to be higher in empathy throughout development.[26] Further assay of brain tools such as event related potentials establish that females who saw man suffering had higher ERP waveforms than males.[26] Another investigation with similar brain tools such equally N400 amplitudes found college N400 in females in response to social situations which positively correlated with self-reported empathy.[26] Structural fMRI studies found females have larger gray matter volumes in posterior inferior frontal and anterior inferior parietal cortex areas which are correlated with mirror neurons in fMRI literature.[26] Females were as well establish to accept stronger link between emotional and cognitive empathy.[26] The researchers institute that the stability of these sex differences in development are unlikely to be explained by whatsoever surroundings influences but rather might accept some roots in human evolution and inheritance.[26]

An evolutionary explanation for the difference is that understanding and tracking relationships and reading others' emotional states was peculiarly of import for women in prehistoric societies for tasks such as caring for children and social networking.[6] Throughout prehistory, females nurtured and were the main caretakers of children so this might have led to an evolved neurological adaptation for women to be more than aware and responsive to not-verbal expressions. According to the Primary Caretaker Hypothesis, prehistoric males did non have same selective pressure level every bit primary caretakers so therefore this might explicate modern day sex activity differences in emotion recognition and empathy.[36]

Aggression [edit]

Although inquiry on sex differences in assailment show that males are by and large more than likely to display aggression than females, how much of this is due to social factors and gender expectations is unclear. Aggression is closely linked with cultural definitions of "masculine" and "feminine". In some situations, women show equal or more aggression than men, although less physical; for instance, women are more probable to use direct assailment in private, where other people cannot see them and are more likely to utilize indirect aggression in public.[37] Men are more likely to exist the targets of displays of assailment and provocation than females. Studies by Bettencourt and Miller evidence that when provocation is controlled for, sexual practice differences in aggression are greatly reduced. They argue that this shows that gender-part norms play a big part in the differences in aggressive behavior betwixt men and women.[38]

Sexual practice differences in aggression are one of the most robust and oldest findings in psychology.[39] Males regardless of age engaged in more physical and verbal aggression while small event for females engaging in more indirect aggression such as rumor spreading or gossiping.[39] Males tend to appoint in more than unprovoked aggression at higher frequency than females.[39] This greater male person aggression is also nowadays in childhood and adolescence.[40] The difference is greater in the physical blazon of aggression, compared to the exact type.[41] Males are more likely to cyber-bully than females.[42] Difference also showed that females reported more cyberbullying behaviour during mid-adolescence, while males showed more than cyber bullying behaviour at late adolescence.[42]

In humans, males engage in criminal offense and especially violent criminal offence more than than females. The relationship betwixt testosterone and assailment is unclear, and a causal link has not been conclusively shown.[43] [44] Some studies bespeak that testosterone levels may exist affected by ecology and social influences.[45] The relationship is hard to study since the only reliable measure of brain testosterone is from a lumbar puncture which is not done for enquiry purposes and many studies accept instead used less reliable measures such as blood testosterone.[ citation needed ] Interest in law-breaking usually rises in the early teens to mid teens, which happen at the same time as testosterone levels rise. Near studies support a link between developed criminality and testosterone, although the relationship is pocket-sized if examined separately for each sex. However, near all studies of juvenile malversation and testosterone are not significant. Near studies accept likewise found testosterone to be associated with behaviors or personality traits linked with criminality such as antisocial behavior and alcoholism.[46]

In species that have high levels of male concrete competition and assailment over females, males tend to be larger and stronger than females. Humans take minor general body sexual dimorphism on characteristics such as height and torso mass. Notwithstanding, this may understate the sexual dimorphism regarding characteristics related to aggression since females have large fat stores. The sexual practice differences are greater for muscle mass and specially for upper torso muscle mass. Men'due south skeleton, peculiarly in the vulnerable face, is more robust. Some other possible explanation, instead of intra-species assailment, for this sexual dimorphism may be that information technology is an adaption for a sexual segmentation of labor with males doing the hunting. Yet, the hunting theory may have difficulty explaining differences regarding features such as stronger protective skeleton, beards (not helpful in hunting, but they increase the perceived size of the jaws and perceived authority, which may be helpful in intra-species male competition), and greater male ability at interception (greater targeting ability tin can be explained by hunting).[47]

Ethics and morality [edit]

Sex differences of moral orientation find that women tend towards a more than intendance-based morality while men tend towards a more justice-based morality.[48] This is commonly based on the fact that men accept slightly more utilitarian reasoning while women take more deontological reasoning which is largely considering of greater female melancholia response and rejection of harm-based behaviours.[49] Women have greater moral sensitivity than men.[fifty] Using the 5 moral principles of care, fairness, loyalty, authority, and purity (based on moral foundations theory), women consistently score higher on care, fairness, and purity across 67 cultures.[51] On the other mitt, sex differences in loyalty and authority were pocket-size in size and highly variable across cultural contexts. Country-level sex differences in all moral foundations in relation to cultural, socioeconomic, and gender-related indicators reveal that global sex differences in moral foundations are larger in individualistic, Western, and gender-equal cultures.[51]

Cognitive traits [edit]

Sex-related differences of cognitive operation is questioned in research done on the areas of perception, attending, reasoning, thinking, problem solving, retention, learning, linguistic communication and emotion.[52] Cognitive testing on the sexes involves written tests that typically have a time limit, the near mutual form being a standardized exam such every bit the Saturday or ACT. These test basic individual abilities rather than complex combination of abilities needed to solve existent life issues.[53] Analysis of the research has found a lack of credibility when relying on published studies most cognition because about comprise findings of cognitive differences between the males and females, merely they overlook those that exercise not bear witness any differences, creating a pool of biased information. Those differences found are attributed to both social and biological factors.[52]

It was once thought that sex differences in cerebral chore and problem solving did not occur until puberty. However, as of 2000, evidence suggested that cognitive and skill differences are present earlier in evolution. For example, researchers have found that 3- and 4-yr-sometime boys were better at targeting and at mentally rotating figures within a clock face than girls of the aforementioned historic period. Prepubescent girls, notwithstanding, excelled at recalling lists of words. These sex activity differences in cognition correspond to patterns of ability rather than overall intelligence. Laboratory settings are used to systematically written report the sexual dimorphism in problem solving task performed past adults.[53]

On average, females excel relative to males on tests that measure recollection. They have an reward on processing speed involving letters, digits and rapid naming tasks.[54] Females tend to have better object location retention and verbal memory.[55] They also perform improve at verbal learning.[56] Females have better performance at matching items and precision tasks, such as placing pegs into designated holes. In maze and path completion tasks, males learn the goal route in fewer trials than females, but females remember more of the landmarks presented. This suggests that females utilise landmarks in everyday situations to orient themselves more than males. Females were meliorate at remembering whether objects had switched places or non.[53]

On boilerplate, males excel relative to females at sure spatial tasks. Specifically, males have an advantage in tests that require the mental rotation or manipulation of an object.[57] In a computer simulation of a maze task, males completed the chore faster and with fewer errors than their female counterparts. Additionally, males have displayed college accuracy in tests of targeted motor skills, such as guiding projectiles.[53] Males are also faster on reaction time and finger tapping tests.[54]

Doreen Kimura, a psychobiologist, has published books and articles specifically on the subject of sex and noesis. Since studying gender differences in cognition, Kimura has farther proved generalizations made from research information nerveless in the field of cognitive psychology.[53] These scientific findings have not been generalized cross culturally.[53] Females have shown to have a higher ability in reading facial and torso cues than their male counterparts. Though studies have institute females to have more advanced verbal skills, men and women in adulthood do not have varied vocabularies. Women tend to have better spelling capabilities and exact retentiveness.[53]

Intelligence [edit]

An commodity published in the Review of Educational Enquiry summarizes the history of the controversy effectually sex differences in variability of intelligence. Through modernistic research, the primary thought has held that males have a much wider range in test performance in IQ tests. The study also analyzes data concerning differences in central tendencies through environmental and biological theories. Males were establish to have much wider variation than females in areas of quantitative reasoning, spatial visualization, spelling, and full general knowledge than females. In the studies conclusion, to form an authentic summary, both the variability in sex differences and in the central tendencies must be examined to generalize the cognitive variances of males and females.[58]

Empirical studies of chiliad, or full general intelligence, in men and women take given inconsistent results, showing either no differences or advantages for either sex activity.[ commendation needed ] The differences in average IQ betwixt women and men are minor in magnitude and inconsistent in direction.[59] [threescore] [61] [62]

Co-ordinate to the 1995 written report Intelligence: Knowns and Unknowns by the American Psychological Clan, "Near standard tests of intelligence have been synthetic and then that there are no overall score differences betwixt females and males."[59] Arthur Jensen in 1998 conducted studies on sex activity differences in intelligence through tests that were "loaded heavily on m" but were not normalized to eliminate sex differences. He concluded, "No evidence was plant for sex differences in the mean level of g. Males, on average, excel on some factors; females on others". Jensen'southward results that no overall sex activity differences existed for yard has been strengthened past researchers who assessed this issue with a battery of 42 mental ability tests and found no overall sex difference.[63]

Although most of the tests showed no difference, in that location were some that did. For example, some tests found females performed improve on exact abilities while males performed better on visuospatial abilities.[63] 1 female advantage is in verbal fluency where they have been found to perform amend in vocabulary, reading comprehension, speech product and essay writing.[64] Males take been specifically found to perform better on spatial visualization, spatial perception, and mental rotation. Researchers had so recommended that general models such as fluid and crystallized intelligence be divided into exact, perceptual and visuospatial domains of g, because when this model is applied then females excel at verbal and perceptual tasks while males on visuospatial tasks.[63]

In that location are, even so, too differences in the capacity of males and females in performing sure tasks, such as rotation of objects in infinite, often categorized as spatial ability. These differences are more than pronounced when people are exposed to a stereotype threat to their gender, which can exist every bit subtle as being asked for their gender before being tested. Differences in mental rotation have also been seen to correlate with estimator feel[65] and video game practise,[66] with as little as 10 hours of video game training reducing the disparity.[67] Other traditionally male person advantages, such as in the field of mathematics are less articulate; again, differences may be acquired by stereotype threats to women.[31] Although females have bottom functioning in spatial abilities on average, they have better performance in processing speed involving messages, digits and rapid naming tasks,[54] object location memory, exact retentiveness,[55] and also verbal learning.[56]

Memory [edit]

The results from inquiry on sex differences in memory are mixed and inconsistent, as some studies show no deviation, and others show a female or male advantage.[68]

Cognitive control of behavior [edit]

A 2011 meta-analyses found that women take small, but persistent, advantages in punishment sensitivity and effortful control across cultures.[69] A 2014 review institute that in humans, women disbelieve more steeply than men,[ description needed ] but sex differences on measures of impulsive activity depend on tasks and discipline samples.[seventy]

Beliefs [edit]

Childhood Play [edit]

The differences between males and females in the context of babyhood play is linked to differences in Gender roles. A enquiry on the "acquisition of fundamental movement skills" found that even though the level of mastery for certain skills where about the same for both boys and girls, later a certain age boys have better object control skills than girls practice.[71]

Some differences in gender roles influence on childhood play are suggested to be biological. A written report by Alexander, Wilcox, and Wood led to the conclusion that toy preferences are innate. The reason being that the infants in the study visually discriminated between dolls and trucks. Where as the girls preferred the dolls over the truck, the boys preferred the trucks.[72]

Hines and Kaufman hypothesized that girls with Congenital Adrenal Hyperplasia who are exposed to high androgen levels during pregnancy might be more physically forceful and rougher like boys are observed to be when they play.[73] The results of Hines and Kaufman's inquiry led them to conclude that androgen didn't crusade girls with Built Adrenal Hyperplasia to be rougher than unaffected girls during play.[74] The study suggested socialization too influenced the type of play children participated in.[75]

Sexual behavior [edit]

Psychological theories exist regarding the development and expression of gender differences in human being sexuality. A number of these theories are consistent in predicting that men should be more approving of casual sexual activity (sexual practice happening outside a stable, committed relationship such as marriage) and should besides be more promiscuous (take a college number of sexual partners) than women.[76]

A sociobiological arroyo applies evolutionary biology to man sexuality, emphasizing reproductive success in shaping patterns of sexual behavior. According to sociobiologists, since women'southward parental investment in reproduction is greater than men's, owing to human being sperm existence much more plentiful than eggs, and the fact that women must devote considerable free energy to gestating their offspring, women will tend to be much more selective in their choice of mates than men. It may not be possible to accurately exam sociobiological theories in relation to promiscuity and coincidental sex in contemporary (U.S.) society, which is quite different from the ancestral human societies in which most natural selection for sexual traits has occurred.[76]

Neoanalytic theories are based on the observation that mothers, equally opposed to fathers, bear the major responsibility for childcare in about families and cultures; both male and female infants, therefore, form an intense emotional attachment to their mother, a woman. According to feminist psychoanalytic theorist Nancy Chodorow, girls tend to preserve this attachment throughout life and define their identities in relational terms, whereas boys must reject this maternal attachment in order to develop a masculine identity. In addition, this theory predicts that women's economic dependence on men in a male-dominated order volition tend to cause women to corroborate of sex more in committed relationships providing economic security, and less so in casual relationships.[76]

The sexual strategies theory by David Osculation and David P. Schmitt is an evolutionary psychology theory regarding female person and male short-term and long-term mating strategies which they argued are dependent on several different goals and vary depending on the environs.[77] [78] [79]

According to social learning theory, sexuality is influenced by people'south social environs. This theory suggests that sexual attitudes and behaviors are learned through ascertainment of role models such as parents and media figures, also as through positive or negative reinforcements for behaviors that match or defy established gender roles. Information technology predicts that gender differences in sexuality can alter over time equally a function of changing social norms, and also that a societal double standard in punishing women more severely than men (who may in fact exist rewarded) for engaging in promiscuous or casual sex volition lead to significant gender differences in attitudes and behaviors regarding sexuality.[76]

Such a societal double standard too figures in social role theory, which suggests that sexual attitudes and behaviors are shaped by the roles that men and women are expected to make full in lodge, and script theory, which focuses on the symbolic meaning of behaviors; this theory suggests that social conventions influence the meaning of specific acts, such as male sexuality beingness tied more to individual pleasure and manlike stereotypes (therefore predicting a high number of casual sexual encounters) and female sexuality being tied more to the quality of a committed relationship.[76]

The ovulatory shift hypothesis is the contested theory that female behaviour and preferences relating to mate selection changes throughout the ovulation cycle. A meta-analysis of 58 studies ended that there was no evidence to support this theory.[80] Another meta-analysis establish that the hypothesis was simply support in regards to brusque-term attraction.[81] Additionally, a 2016 paper suggested that any possible changes in preferences during ovulation would exist moderated by the relationship quality itself, fifty-fifty to the point of inversion in favor of the female's current partner.[82]

A contempo study sought to exam the connexion between current fertility status and sociesexual attitudes and desires; the researchers concluded that their hypothesis was not met, meaning they found no connection between women's fertility status and sociosexual desires or attitudes.[83]

Mental health [edit]

Childhood acquit disorder and adult antisocial personality disorder also every bit substance use disorders are more mutual in men. Many mood disorders, anxiety disorders, and eating disorders are more common in women. One explanation is that men tend to externalize stress while women tend to internalize it. Gender differences vary to some degree for different cultures.[84]

Men and women do not differ on their overall rates of psychopathology; notwithstanding, certain disorders are more than prevalent in women, and vice versa. Women take higher rates of feet and depression (internalizing disorders) and men have college rates of substance corruption and antisocial disorders (externalizing disorders). It is believed that divisions of power and the responsibilities set upon each sex activity are critical to this predisposition. Namely, women earn less money than men do, they tend to have jobs with less ability and autonomy, and women are more responsive to problems of people in their social networks. These three differences can contribute to women'due south predisposition to anxiety and depression. It is suggested that socializing practices that encourage high self-regard and mastery would benefit the mental wellness of both women and men.[85]

Anxiety and depression [edit]

Ane study interviewed 18,572 respondents, anile 18 and over, well-nigh fifteen phobic symptoms. These symptoms would yield diagnoses based on criteria for agoraphobia, social phobia, and uncomplicated phobia. Women had significantly college prevalence rates of agoraphobia and simple phobia; however, there were no differences found between men and women in social phobia. The nearly mutual phobias for both women and men involved spiders, bugs, mice, snakes, and heights. The biggest differences betwixt men and women in these disorders were found on the agoraphobic symptoms of "going out of the business firm alone" and "existence solitary", and on two simple phobic symptoms, involving the fright of "any harmless or unsafe animal" and "storms", with relatively more than women having both phobias. In that location were no differences in the age of onset, reporting a fear on the phobic level, telling a doctor nearly symptoms, or the recall of past symptoms.[86]

Women are more probable than men to accept depression. One 1987 study establish little empirical back up for several proposed explanations, including biological ones, and argued that when depressed women tend to ruminate which may lower the mood further while men tend to distract themselves with activities. This may develop from women and men existence raised differently.[87]

Suicide [edit]

There are also differences regarding gender and suicide. Although females have more suicide attempts, males are much more likely to die from suicide.[88]

Schizophrenia [edit]

Women and men are both every bit likely at developing symptoms of schizophrenia, only the onset occurs earlier for men. It has been suggested that sexually dimorphic brain anatomy, the differential furnishings of estrogens and androgens, and the heavy exposure of male adolescents to alcohol and other toxic substances can atomic number 82 to this earlier onset in men. It is believed that estrogens have a protective effect confronting the symptoms of schizophrenia. Although, information technology has been shown that other factors tin can contribute to the delayed onset and symptoms in women, estrogens have a big consequence, every bit tin exist seen during a pregnancy. In pregnancy, estrogen levels are ascent in women, so women who have had recurrent astute episodes of schizophrenia did not normally break down. Even so, after pregnancy, when estrogen levels have dropped, women tend to suffer from postpartum psychoses. Also, psychotic symptoms are exacerbated when, during the menstrual cycle, estrogen levels are at their everyman. In addition, estrogen treatment has yielded benign effects in patients with schizophrenia.[89]

Autism Spectrum Disorder [edit]

The epidemiology of autism spectrum disorder varies amidst males and females. Globally, data isn't available for every individual country, but a worldwide review of epidemiological surveys, constitute a median of 62 out of 10,000 people have ASD.[90] Amongst eight-twelvemonth-olds in the Us 1 in 44 children take been identified with autism spectrum disorder, only it is "four times more mutual amid males than females."[91] According to a research looking at the disparity between the actual prevalence of ASD and what actually gets diagnosed, there is a 2:1 ratio of males to females who are undiagnosed. This same statistic suggests that females have a disadvantage when it comes to being diagnosed and are underrepresented.[92]

The "extreme male brain" or empathizing–systemizing theory views the autism spectrum every bit an extreme version of male-female differences regarding systemizing and empathizing abilities.[93] It'due south used to explain the possible reason why males with ASD score higher on systemizing tests than females with ASD.[94]

Symptom presentation in girls with ASD aren't as noticeable the mode they are in boys. Females are ameliorate able to cope with the symptoms and ofttimes camouflage to exist able to fit in, and have relationships.[95] Females with ASD are meliorate able to fit in socially, and class relationships with others than boys are.[96] Camouflaging has been suggested to be the cause of females with ASD having more than emotional distress when male person counterparts usually had more than external social problems.[94]

According to the Female Protective Issue Hypothesis, for females to develop autism they need to have acquired a wider range of genetic mutations than their male person counterpart.[97]

The imprinted brain hypothesis argues that autism and psychosis are contrasting disorders on a number of different variables and that this is caused past an unbalanced genomic imprinting favoring paternal genes (autism) or maternal genes (psychosis).[98] [99]

Possible causes [edit]

Both biological and social/environmental factors have been studied for their touch on on sex differences. Separating biological from environmental effects is hard, and advocates for biological influences more often than not accept that social factors are also important.[100]

Biological [edit]

Biological differentiation is a key office of human reproduction. By and large, males have two different sex chromosomes, an X and a Y; females accept ii 10 chromosomes. The Y chromosome, more precisely the SRY gene located on it, is what mostly determines sexual differentiation. If a Y chromosome with a SRY factor is present, growth is along male lines; it results in the product of testes, which in turn produce testosterone. In add-on to physical effects, this prenatal testosterone increases the likeliness of sure "male person" patterns of behavior after birth, though the exact affect and machinery are non well understood. Parts of the SRY and specific parts of the Y chromosome may also possibly influence dissimilar gender behaviors, but if so, these impacts take not yet been identified.[101]

Biological perspectives on psychological differentiation oft place parallels to the concrete nature of sexual differentiation. These parallels include genetic and hormonal factors that create dissimilar individuals, with the main difference being the reproductive function. The brain controls behavior by individuals, but information technology is influenced by genes, hormones and evolution. Prove has shown that the ways that male and female children go adults is different, and that there are variations between the individuals of each sex.[102] [ better source needed ]

Sex linkage [edit]

Psychological traits can vary between the sexes through sexual practice-linkage. That is to say, what causes a trait may exist related to the chromosomal sexual activity of the individual.[103] In dissimilarity, there are likewise[104] "sex-influenced" (or sex-conditioned) traits, in which the phenotypic manifestation of a cistron depends on the sexual activity of the individual.[ clarification needed ] [105] Even in a homozygous dominant or recessive female the condition may not be expressed fully.[ citation needed ] "Sex activity-limited" traits are characteristics just expressed in i sex activity. They may be caused by genes on either autosomal or sexual practice chromosomes.[105]

Evidence exists that there are sexual activity-linked differences between the male and female encephalon.[106]

Epigenetics [edit]

Epigenetic changes take too been found to crusade sexual practice-based differentiation in the encephalon.[107] The extent and nature of these differences are not fully characterised.[31] [106] [107] Differences in socialization of males and females may subtract or increment the size of sex differences.[1] [two] [6]

Neuroscience [edit]

A 2021 meta-synthesis of existing literature constitute that sex activity accounted for one% of the brain'south structure or laterality, finding large group-level differences only in total brain book.[108] This partially contradicts a review from 2006 and a meta-analysis from 2014 which plant that some evidence from brain morphology and function studies indicates that male and female brains cannot e'er exist assumed to be identical from either a structural or functional perspective, and some encephalon structures are sexually dimorphic.[109] [110]

Culture [edit]

[edit]

Differences in socialization of males and females are known to cause, decrease, or increase the magnitude of various sex differences.[1] [2]

In near cultures, humans are bailiwick from infancy to gender socialization. For case, babe girls typically wear pink and babe boys typically habiliment blue. Gender schemas, or gendered cultural ethics which determine a person's preferences, are too installed into our behaviors beginning at infancy.[111]

As people get older, gender stereotypes become more applied. The social role theory primarily deals with such stereotypes, more specifically the sectionalization of labor and a gender hierarchy. When this theory is applied in social settings, such every bit the workplace, it can often lead to sexism. This theory also applies to certain personality trails, such as men are more typically more assertive and women more passive. According to this theory, ideally, in about cultures, the woman is to stay and tend to the house and home while the man works to both better the business firm itself and increment finances.[112]

In the midst of so many idealistic concepts on the roles of a specific gender in social club, in that location are also individuals who choose to non to conform to the ideas of their civilisation. Throughout history, gender roles have been contradistinct and are much more than flexible than they were in recent centuries. Such alterations include equal political rights as well as employment and education opportunities solely available to females. Homosexual people are also subject to go against gender conformities. The term congenital gender invert is used to define homosexuals who possess a trait of the opposite sex. Such individuals tend to have the near social difficulty in regards to cultural norms.[113]

Evolutionary product [edit]

Donald Symons has argued that fundamental sex differences in genetics, hormones and brain structure and function may manifest as distal cultural phenomena (east.g., males as primary combatants in warfare, the primarily female readership of romance novels, etc.).[114] In that location has been significant feminist critique of these and other evolutionary psychology arguments, from both within and outside of the scientific community.[115]

See also [edit]

  • Feminization (sociology)
  • Feminine psychology

References [edit]

  1. ^ a b c d Lippa, Richard (2005). Gender, Nature, and Nurture (2d ed.). Psychology Press. ISBN978-0-8058-5345-2. OCLC 60337744. [ folio needed ]
  2. ^ a b c d due east f g h Halpern, Diane F. (2012). Sex differences in cognitive abilities (4 ed.). London: Routledge. ISBN9781848729414.
  3. ^ Richardson, S.S. (2013). Sex Itself: The Search for Male and Female in the Human Genome. Chicago, US: University of Chicago Printing. ISBN978-0-226-08471-8 . Retrieved 2021-12-29 . [ page needed ]
  4. ^ Becker, J.B., Berkley, One thousand. J., Geary, N., & Hampson, Due east. (2007) Sex Differences in the Brain: From Genes to Beliefs. NY: Oxford University Press.[ page needed ]
  5. ^ Helmuth, Due north. (1994). Hormones, Sex, and Society. NY: Praeger.[ folio needed ]
  6. ^ a b c d Geary, David C. (1998). Male, female: The development of human sex differences. American Psychological Clan. ISBN978-ane-55798-527-9. [ page needed ]
  7. ^ Mealey, Fifty. (2000). Sex differences. NY: Academic Press.[ folio needed ]
  8. ^ Buss, D.Thou. (2009). Evolutionary Psychology: The New Science of the Mind. Pearson/Allyn and Bacon. ISBN978-0-205-69439-6.
  9. ^ Roscoe, Volition (2000). Changing ones: third and fourth genders in Native North America. New York: St. Martin's Griffin. ISBN0-312-22479-6. OCLC 44754662.
  10. ^ Martin, M. Kay and Voorhies, Barbara (1975). Supernumerary Sexes, affiliate iv of Female person of the Species (New York: Columbia University Press, 1975).
  11. ^ Miller, Geoffrey (2001). The mating listen: how sexual choice shaped the evolution of human nature. New York: Anchor Books. ISBN0-385-49517-X. OCLC 47923735.
  12. ^ a b Zosuls, Kristina M.; Miller, Cindy Faith; Ruble, Diane North.; Martin, Carol Lynn; Fabes, Richard A. (2011-02-09). "Gender Development Enquiry in Sex Roles: Historical Trends and Future Directions". Sex activity Roles. Springer Science and Business Media LLC. 64 (11–12): 826–842. doi:ten.1007/s11199-010-9902-iii. ISSN 0360-0025. PMC3131694. PMID 21747580.
  13. ^ Dow, Bonnie J., & Forest, J.(Eds.). (2006). Introduction. In The SAGE Handbook of Gender and Communication. Chiliad Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.
  14. ^ Colapinto, John. 'The True Story of John/Joan'. The Rolling Stone, December 11, 1997, pp. 54-97.
  15. ^ a b Costa, Paul, Jr.; Terracciano, Antonio; McCrae, Robert R. (2001). "Gender differences in personality traits across cultures: Robust and surprising findings". Journal of Personality and Social Psychology (Secondary analysis). 81 (2): 322–31. doi:x.1037/0022-3514.81.2.322. PMID 11519935.
  16. ^ Hyde, Janet Shibley (September 2005). "The gender similarities hypothesis". American Psychologist. 60 (vi): 581–592. CiteSeerX10.i.1.374.1723. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.60.six.581. PMID 16173891.
  17. ^ a b c d Schmitt, David P.; Realo, Anu; Voracek, Martin; Allik, Jüri (2008). "Why tin can't a man be more like a woman? Sex differences in Large Five personality traits across 55 cultures". Journal of Personality and Social Psychology (Large-scale research). 94 (1): 168–82. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.94.i.168. PMID 18179326.
  18. ^ Christie, R. & Geis, F. (1970) "Studies in Machiavellianism". NY: Bookish Press.[ folio needed ]
  19. ^ a b c Grijalva, Emily; Newman, Daniel A.; Tay, Louis; Donnellan, M. Brent; Harms, P. D.; Robins, Richard W.; Yan, Taiyi (March 2015). "Gender differences in narcissism: A meta-analytic review". Psychological Bulletin (Meta-analysis). 141 (ii): 261–310. doi:10.1037/a0038231. PMID 25546498.
  20. ^ Feingold, Alan (1994). "Gender differences in personality: A meta-analysis". Psychological Bulletin (Meta-analysis). 116 (iii): 429–456. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.116.3.429. PMID 7809307.
  21. ^ Su, Rong; Rounds, James; Armstrong, Patrick Ian (Nov 2009). "Men and things, women and people: A meta-analysis of sex differences in interests". Psychological Bulletin (Meta-assay). 135 (6): 859–884. doi:x.1037/a0017364. PMID 19883140.
  22. ^ a b c d Niedenthal, Paula; Silvia, Krauth-Gruber; Ric, François (2006). Psychology of emotion: interpersonal, experiential, and cognitive approaches. Principles of Social Psychology. New York: Psychology Press. ISBNane-84169-402-nine. OCLC 64208312.
  23. ^ Hatfield, Elaine; Cacioppo, John T.; Rapson, Richard 50. (1993). "Emotional Contagion". Electric current Directions in Psychological Science. SAGE Publications. 2 (3): 96–100. doi:x.1111/1467-8721.ep10770953. ISSN 0963-7214. S2CID 220533081.
  24. ^ Reeves, Jamie Lawson (18 June 1998). "Women more likely than men to put emotions in motion". Vanderbilt News. Nashville. Archived from the original on 2012-07-24. Retrieved 3 Apr 2008.
  25. ^ Wood, Samuel; Wood, Ellen; Boyd, Denise (2005). The World of Psychology (5th ed.). Boston, MA: Allyn and Bacon. ISBN0-205-36137-iv. OCLC 53987049.
  26. ^ a b c d eastward f k h Christov-Moore, Leonardo; Simpson, Elizabeth A.; Coudé, Gino; Grigaityte, Kristina; Iacoboni, Marco; Ferrari, Pier Francesco (October 2014). "Empathy: Gender effects in encephalon and behavior". Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews (Review). 46: 604–627. doi:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2014.09.001. PMC5110041. PMID 25236781.
  27. ^ Hall, Judith A. (1978). "Gender effects in decoding nonverbal cues". Psychological Bulletin (Systematic review). 85 (4): 845–857. doi:ten.1037/0033-2909.85.4.845.
  28. ^ Hall, Judith A. (1984). Nonverbal Sex Differences: Communication Accurateness and Expressive Style (Review). Johns Hopkins University Printing. p. 207. ISBN978-0-8018-2440-one . Retrieved 2021-12-29 .
  29. ^ Hall, Judith A.; Carter, Jason D.; Horgan, Terrence G. (2000). "Gender differences in nonverbal communication of emotion". In Fischer, Agneta H. (ed.). Gender and Emotion: Social Psychological Perspectives (Volume chapter). Studies in Emotion and Social Interaction. Cambridge University Printing. pp. 97–117. doi:10.1017/CBO9780511628191.006. ISBN978-0-521-63015-3 . Retrieved 2021-12-29 .
  30. ^ Fischer, Agneta H.; Manstead, Antony S. R. (2000). "The relation betwixt gender and emotion in unlike cultures". In Fischer, Agneta H. (ed.). Gender and Emotion: Social Psychological Perspectives (Book chapter). Studies in Emotion and Social Interaction. Cambridge University Press. pp. 71–94. doi:10.1017/CBO9780511628191.005. ISBN978-0-521-63986-6 . Retrieved 2021-12-29 .
  31. ^ a b c d Fine, Cordelia (2010). Delusions of Gender: How Our Minds, Society, and Neurosexism Create Difference. West. W. Norton. ISBN978-0393068382.
  32. ^ Ickes, W. (1997). Empathic accuracy. New York: The Guilford Press.[ folio needed ]
  33. ^ a b Kret, K. E.; De Gelder, B. (1 June 2012). "A review on sexual activity differences in processing emotional signals". Neuropsychologia. 50 (7): 1211–1221. doi:x.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2011.12.022. PMID 22245006. S2CID 11695245.
  34. ^ Kirkland, R. A.; Peterson, E.; Baker, C. A.; Miller, Due south.; Pulos, S. (2013). "Meta-assay reveals adult female superiority in 'Reading the Listen in the Eyes' Test". North American Journal of Psychology. 15 (i): 121–146.
  35. ^ Thompson, Ashley E.; Voyer, Daniel (3 October 2014). "Sex differences in the ability to recognise non-verbal displays of emotion: A meta-assay". Knowledge and Emotion. 28 (seven): 1164–1195. doi:10.1080/02699931.2013.875889. PMID 24400860. S2CID 5402395.
  36. ^ Christov-Moore, Leonardo (2014). "Empathy: Gender effects in brain and behavior". Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews (Review). 46: 604–627. doi:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2014.09.001. PMC5110041. PMID 25236781.
  37. ^ Chrisler, Joan C; Donald R. McCreary (11 February 2012). Handbook of Gender Research in Psychology. Springer, 2010. ISBN9781441914644. [ folio needed ]
  38. ^ Bettencourt, B. Ann; Miller, Norman (1996). "Gender differences in aggression equally a function of provocation: A meta-analysis". Psychological Bulletin. 119 (3): 422–47. CiteSeerXten.1.1.476.1949. doi:ten.1037/0033-2909.119.three.422. PMID 8668747.
  39. ^ a b c Del Giudice, Marco (2015). "Gender Differences in Personality and Social Behavior". International Encyclopedia of the Social & Behavioral Sciences. pp. 750–756. doi:x.1016/B978-0-08-097086-8.25100-3. ISBN978-0-08-097087-five.
  40. ^ Card, Noel A.; Stucky, Brian D.; Sawalani, Gita M.; Lilliputian, Todd D. (September 2008). "Straight and Indirect Aggression During Childhood and Adolescence: A Meta-Analytic Review of Gender Differences, Intercorrelations, and Relations to Maladjustment". Kid Evolution. 79 (5): 1185–1229. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8624.2008.01184.x. PMID 18826521.
  41. ^ Campbell, Anne (2007-04-05). "Sex differences in assailment". In Barrett, Louise; Dunbar, Robin (eds.). Oxford Handbooks Online. Oxford Academy Press. doi:ten.1093/oxfordhb/9780198568308.013.0025.
  42. ^ a b Barlett, Christopher; Coyne, Sarah 1000. (September 2014). "A meta-assay of sex differences in cyber-bullying behavior: The moderating office of historic period: Sexual practice Differences in Cyber-Bullying". Aggressive Behavior (Meta-analysis). xl (v): 474–488. doi:10.1002/ab.21555. PMID 25098968.
  43. ^ Businesswoman, Robert A., Deborah R. Richardson, Human Assailment: Perspectives in Social Psychology, Springer, 2004, ISBN 0-306-48434-X, 9780306484346[ page needed ]
  44. ^ Albert, D.J.; Walsh, M.Fifty.; Jonik, R.H. (1993). "Aggression in humans: What is its biological foundation?". Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews (Review). 17 (4): 405–25. doi:x.1016/S0149-7634(05)80117-4. PMID 8309650. S2CID 28557481.
  45. ^ Hillbrand, Marc; Pallone, Nathaniel J, eds. (1994). The psychobiology of assailment: engines, measurement, command. Haworth Printing. ISBN978-1-56024-715-9. OCLC 605125583. [ folio needed ]
  46. ^ Handbook of Crime Correlates; Lee Ellis, Kevin M. Beaver, John Wright; 2009; Academic Press[ page needed ]
  47. ^ Puts, David A. (2010). "Beauty and the beast: Mechanisms of sexual selection in humans". Evolution and Human being Behavior. 31 (three): 157–175. doi:10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2010.02.005.
  48. ^ Jaffee, Sara; Hyde, Janet Shibley (2000). "Gender differences in moral orientation: A meta-assay". Psychological Bulletin (Meta-analysis). 126 (5): 703–726. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.126.5.703. PMID 10989620.
  49. ^ Friesdorf, Rebecca; Conway, Paul; Gawronski, Bertram (May 2015). "Gender Differences in Responses to Moral Dilemmas: A Process Dissociation Analysis". Personality and Social Psychology Message (Meta-assay). 41 (5): 696–713. doi:10.1177/0146167215575731. PMID 25840987. S2CID 206445474.
  50. ^ You, Di; Maeda, Yukiko; Bebeau, Muriel J. (2011). "Gender Differences in Moral Sensitivity: A Meta-Assay". Ethics & Behavior (Meta-analysis). 21 (iv): 263–282. doi:10.1080/10508422.2011.585591. S2CID 143045744. Retrieved xviii December 2015.
  51. ^ a b Atari, Mohammad; Lai, Marker H. C.; Dehghani, Morteza (28 Oct 2020). "Sex differences in moral judgements across 67 countries". Proceedings of the Regal Society B: Biological Sciences (Large-scale international enquiry). 287 (1937): 20201201. doi:10.1098/rspb.2020.1201. PMC7661301. PMID 33081618. S2CID 224805138.
  52. ^ a b Wittig, Thousand.A.; Petersen, A.C. (1979). Sex activity-related Differences in Cognitive Functioning: Developmental Issues. Academic Press series in cognition and perception. Bookish Press. ISBN978-0-12-761150-1.
  53. ^ a b c d due east f g Kimura, Doreen (1999). Sex and cognition. Cambridge, Mass: MIT Printing. ISBN978-0-262-11236-9. OCLC 42856228.
  54. ^ a b c Roivainen, Eka (2011). "Gender differences in processing speed: A review of recent research". Learning and Individual Differences. 21 (ii): 145–149. doi:ten.1016/j.lindif.2010.11.021.
  55. ^ a b Li, Rena (1 September 2014). "Why women meet differently from the way men run into? A review of sex differences in noesis and sports". Periodical of Sport and Wellness Science (Review). iii (3): 155–162. doi:ten.1016/j.jshs.2014.03.012. PMC4266559. PMID 25520851.
  56. ^ a b Wallentin Grand (March 2009). "Putative sexual activity differences in verbal abilities and language cortex: a critical review". Brain and Language. 108 (3): 175–83. doi:10.1016/j.bandl.2008.07.001. PMID 18722007. S2CID 9898786.
  57. ^ Miller DI, Halpern DF (January 2014). "The new science of cerebral sex differences". Trends in Cognitive Sciences. 18 (one): 37–45. doi:10.1016/j.tics.2013.10.011. PMID 24246136. S2CID 4070016.
  58. ^ Feingold, Allen. (Spring, 1992). Sexual practice Differences in Variability in Intellectual Abilities: A New Look at an Quondam Controversy. Review of Educational Enquiry, 62, 61-84.
  59. ^ a b Neisser, Ulric; Boodoo, Gwyneth; Bouchard, Thomas J.; Boykin, A. Wade; Brody, Nathan; Ceci, Stephen J.; Halpern, Diane F.; Loehlin, John C.; Perloff, Robert; Sternberg, Robert J.; Urbina, Susana (February 1996). Intelligence: Knowns and unknowns. American Psychologist (Taskforce report). Vol. 51. pp. 77–101. CiteSeerX10.ane.one.322.5525. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.51.2.77.
  60. ^ Baumeister, Roy F (2001). Social psychology and human sexuality: essential readings. Psychology Printing. ISBN978-1-84169-019-3. [ page needed ]
  61. ^ Baumeister, Roy F. (2010). Is There Anything Skillful Nearly Men?: How Cultures Flourish By Exploiting Men. Oxford University Printing. ISBN978-0-19-537410-0. [ page needed ]
  62. ^ Hedges, L.; Nowell, A (1995). "Sex differences in mental test scores, variability, and numbers of high-scoring individuals". Science. 269 (5220): 41–5. Bibcode:1995Sci...269...41H. doi:10.1126/scientific discipline.7604277. PMID 7604277.
  63. ^ a b c Nisbett, Richard E.; Aronson, Joshua; Blair, Clancy; Dickens, William; Flynn, James; Halpern, Diane F.; Turkheimer, Eric (Feb 2012). "Intelligence: New findings and theoretical developments". American Psychologist (Review). 67 (2): 130–159. doi:10.1037/a0026699. PMID 22233090.
  64. ^ Hyde, Janet Shibley (2006). "Women in Science and Mathematics: Gender Similarities in Abilities and Sociocultural Forces". Biological, Social, and Organizational Components of Success for Women in Academic Science and Engineering. National Academies Press.
  65. ^ Terlecki, Melissa S.; Newcombe, Nora S. (September 2005). "How Important Is the Digital Divide? The Relation of Computer and Videogame Usage to Gender Differences in Mental Rotation Ability". Sexual practice Roles. 53 (v–6): 433–441. doi:10.1007/s11199-005-6765-0. S2CID 144263258.
  66. ^ Cherney, Isabelle D. (December 2008). "Mom, Allow Me Play More Computer Games: They Better My Mental Rotation Skills". Sex Roles. 59 (xi–12): 776–786. doi:x.1007/s11199-008-9498-z. S2CID 10166843.
  67. ^ Feng, Jing; Spence, Ian; Pratt, Jay (Oct 2007). "Playing an Activity Video Game Reduces Gender Differences in Spatial Noesis". Psychological Scientific discipline. 18 (10): 850–855. doi:x.1111/j.1467-9280.2007.01990.10. PMID 17894600. S2CID 5885796.
  68. ^ Ellis, Lee, Sex differences: summarizing more than a century of scientific research, CRC Printing, 2008, ISBN 0-8058-5959-4, ISBN 978-0-8058-5959-ane[ page needed ]
  69. ^ Cross, Catharine P.; Copping, Lee T.; Campbell, Anne (January 2011). "Sex activity differences in impulsivity: A meta-analysis" (PDF). Psychological Message (Meta-analysis). 137 (one): 97–130. doi:10.1037/a0021591. PMID 21219058. S2CID 25988737.
  70. ^ Weafer, J.; De Wit, H. (2013). "Sexual activity differences in impulsive action and impulsive choice". Addictive Behaviors (Review). 39 (11): 1573–1579. doi:10.1016/j.addbeh.2013.10.033. PMC4012004. PMID 24286704.
  71. ^ Hardy, Louise L.; Male monarch, Lesley; Farrell, Louise; Macniven, Rona; Howlett, Sarah (2010-09-01). "Fundamental movement skills amid Australian preschool children". Journal of Scientific discipline and Medicine in Sport. 13 (five): 503–508. doi:10.1016/j.jsams.2009.05.010. ISSN 1440-2440. PMID 19850520.
  72. ^ Alexander, Gerianne M.; Wilcox, Teresa; Woods, Rebecca (2009-06-01). "Sexual practice Differences in Infants' Visual Interest in Toys". Athenaeum of Sexual Behavior. 38 (3): 427–433. doi:10.1007/s10508-008-9430-1. ISSN 1573-2800. PMID 19016318. S2CID 20435292.
  73. ^ Fabes, Richard A.; Martin, Ballad Lynn; Hanish, Laura D. (2003). "Immature Children's Play Qualities in Aforementioned-, Other-, and Mixed-Sex Peer Groups". Child Development. 74 (3): 921–932. doi:10.1111/1467-8624.00576. ISSN 0009-3920. JSTOR 3696237. PMID 12795398.
  74. ^ Hines, Melissa; Kaufman, Francine R. (August 1994). "Androgen and the Evolution of Human Sex-Typical Behavior: Rough-and-Tumble Play and Sex of Preferred Playmates in Children with Congenital Adrenal Hyperplasia (CAH)". Kid Development. 65 (four): 1042–1053. doi:10.2307/1131303. JSTOR 1131303. PMID 7956464.
  75. ^ Langlois, Judith H.; Downs, A. Chris (December 1980). "Mothers, Fathers, and Peers as Socialization Agents of Sexual activity-Typed Play Behaviors in Young Children". Child Development. 51 (iv): 1237. doi:10.2307/1129566. JSTOR 1129566.
  76. ^ a b c d e Oliver, Mary Beth; Hyde, Janet Due south. (2001). "Gender Differences in Sexuality: A Meta-Analysis". In Baumeister, Roy F. (ed.). Social Psychology and Man Sexuality: Essential Readings. Psychology Press. pp. 29–43. ISBN978-1-84-169019-three.
  77. ^ Schuett, Wiebke; Tregenza, Tom; Tiresome, Sasha R. X. (xix Baronial 2009). "Sexual selection and animal personality". Biological Reviews (Narrative review). 85 (two): 217–246. doi:10.1111/j.1469-185X.2009.00101.x. PMID 19922534. S2CID 205599191.
  78. ^ Kiss, David Michael; Schmitt, David P. (2011). "Evolutionary Psychology and Feminism". Sex Roles. 64 (ix–10): 768–787. doi:10.1007/s11199-011-9987-3. S2CID 7878675.
  79. ^ Petersen, JL; Hyde, JS (January 2010). "A meta-analytic review of research on gender differences in sexuality, 1993-2007". Psychological Bulletin (Meta-analysis). 136 (ane): 21–38. CiteSeerX10.1.1.464.1733. doi:10.1037/a0017504. PMID 20063924.
  80. ^ Wood, Wendy; Kressel, Laura; Joshi, Priyanka D.; Louie, Brian (July 2014). "Meta-Analysis of Menstrual Cycle Effects on Women's Mate Preferences". Emotion Review (Meta-analysis). six (iii): 229–249. doi:ten.1177/1754073914523073. S2CID 4641508.
  81. ^ Gildersleeve, Kelly; Haselton, Martie M.; Fales, Melissa R. (2014). "Do women's mate preferences change across the ovulatory cycle? A meta-analytic review". Psychological Bulletin (Meta-analysis). 140 (5): 1205–1259. doi:10.1037/a0035438. PMID 24564172.
  82. ^ Durante, Kristina K.; Eastwick, Paul W.; Finkel, Eli J.; Gangestad, Steven West.; Simpson, Jeffry A. (2016). "Pair-Bonded Relationships and Romantic Alternatives". Advances in Experimental Social Psychology (Conference contribution). Elsevier. 53: 1–74. doi:10.1016/bs.aesp.2015.09.001. ISBN978-0-12-804737-8.
  83. ^ Thomas, Andrew G.; Armstrong, Stephanie Fifty.; Stewart-Williams, Steve; Jones, Bridegroom C. (2021). "Current Fertility Status Does Not Predict Sociosexual Attitudes and Desires in Usually Ovulating Women". Evolutionary Psychology. 19 (i). doi:10.1177/1474704920976318. PMID 33412934. S2CID 231192372.
  84. ^ Afifi, M (2007). "Gender differences in mental health". Singapore Medical Journal (Review). 48 (5): 385–91. PMID 17453094.
  85. ^ Rosenfield, Sarah. "Gender and mental health: Exercise women have more psychopathology, men more, or both the aforementioned (and why)?". In Horwitz, Allan V.; Scheid, Teresa Fifty. (eds.). A handbook for the study of mental health: Social contexts, theories, and systems. New York: Cambridge University Press. pp. 348–60.
  86. ^ Bourdon, Karen H.; Boyd, Jeffrey H.; Rae, Donald Southward.; Burns, Barbara J.; Thompson, James W.; Locke, Ben Z. (1988). "Gender differences in phobias: Results of the ECA community survey". Journal of Anxiety Disorders. 2 (3): 227–241. doi:x.1016/0887-6185(88)90004-7.
  87. ^ Nolen-Hoeksema, Susan (1987). "Sex differences in unipolar depression: Evidence and theory". Psychological Bulletin. 101 (two): 259–82. CiteSeerX10.ane.1.321.597. doi:ten.1037/0033-2909.101.2.259. PMID 3562707.
  88. ^ Bosson, Jennifer 1000.; Vandello, Joseph A.; Camille E., Buckner (2018). The Psychology of Sex and Gender. Sage Publications. p. 403. ISBN978-1-l-633133-1.
  89. ^ Seeman, Mary (1997). "Psychopathology in Women and Men: Focus on Female Hormones". The American Journal of Psychiatry. 154 (12): 1641–7. doi:10.1176/ajp.154.12.1641. PMID 9396940.
  90. ^ Elsabbagh, Mayada; Divan, Gauri; Koh, Yun-Joo; Kim, Immature Shin; Kauchali, Shuaib; Marcín, Carlos; Montiel-Nava, Cecilia; Patel, Vikram; Paula, Cristiane Due south; Wang, Chongying; Yasamy, Mohammad Taghi (June 2012). "Global Prevalence of Autism and Other Pervasive Developmental Disorders". Autism Research. 5 (3): 160–179. doi:10.1002/aur.239. ISSN 1939-3792. PMC3763210. PMID 22495912.
  91. ^ CDC (2021-12-02). "Data and Statistics on Autism Spectrum Disorder | CDC". Centers for Disease Control and Prevention . Retrieved 2022-02-25 .
  92. ^ Russell, Ginny; Ford, Tamsin; Steer, Colin; Golding, Jean (2010-03-22). "Identification of children with the aforementioned level of impairment as children on the autistic spectrum, and analysis of their service employ". Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry. 51 (6): 643–651. doi:10.1111/j.1469-7610.2010.02233.10. ISSN 0021-9630. PMID 20345841.
  93. ^ Businesswoman-Cohen, Simon (2007). "The development of empathizing and systemizing: assortative mating of ii stiff systemizers and the cause of autism". In Barrett, Louise; Dunbar, Robin (eds.). Oxford Handbook of Evolutionary Psychology. doi:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198568308.013.0016. ISBN978-0-19-856830-viii.
  94. ^ a b Mandy, William; Chilvers, Rebecca; Chowdhury, Uttom; Salter, Gemma; Seigal, Anna; Skuse, David (2012-07-01). "Sexual activity Differences in Autism Spectrum Disorder: Evidence from a Large Sample of Children and Adolescents". Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders. 42 (7): 1304–1313. doi:10.1007/s10803-011-1356-0. ISSN 1573-3432. PMID 21947663. S2CID 18639019.
  95. ^ Dworzynski, Katharina; Ronald, Angelica; Bolton, Patrick; Happé, Francesca (2012-08-01). "How Different Are Girls and Boys Above and Below the Diagnostic Threshold for Autism Spectrum Disorders?". Periodical of the American University of Kid & Adolescent Psychiatry. 51 (8): 788–797. doi:10.1016/j.jaac.2012.05.018. ISSN 0890-8567. PMID 22840550.
  96. ^ Head, Alexandra M; McGillivray, Jane A; Stokes, Mark A (2014-02-28). "Gender differences in emotionality and sociability in children with autism spectrum disorders". Molecular Autism. v (1): 19. doi:ten.1186/2040-2392-5-19. ISSN 2040-2392. PMC3945617. PMID 24576331.
  97. ^ Jacquemont, Sébastien; Coe, Bradley P.; Hersch, Micha; Duyzend, Michael H.; Krumm, Niklas; Bergmann, Sven; Beckmann, Jacques S.; Rosenfeld, Jill A.; Eichler, Evan Eastward. (March 2014). "A College Mutational Burden in Females Supports a "Female Protective Model" in Neurodevelopmental Disorders". The American Journal of Human Genetics. 94 (3): 415–425. doi:10.1016/j.ajhg.2014.02.001. ISSN 0002-9297. PMC3951938. PMID 24581740.
  98. ^ Schlomer, Gabriel Fifty.; Del Giudice, Marco; Ellis, Bruce J. (2011). "Parent–offspring conflict theory: An evolutionary framework for understanding conflict within human families". Psychological Review. 118 (3): 496–521. doi:x.1037/a0024043. PMID 21604906.
  99. ^ Badcock, Christopher; Crespi, Bernard (2008). "Battle of the sexes may prepare the brain". Nature. 454 (7208): 1054–five. Bibcode:2008Natur.454.1054B. doi:ten.1038/4541054a. PMID 18756240. S2CID 5890859.
  100. ^ Martin, Unhurt; Finn, Stephen East. Masculinity and Femininity in the MMPI-2 and MMPI-A. Academy of Minnesota Press. p. xiv. ISBN978-0-8166-2444-7.
  101. ^ John Bancroft. (2002). Biological factors in homo sexuality. Retrieved Oct 21, 2011, from http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_m2372/is_1_39/ai_87080435/. PMID: 12476251 DOI: x.1080/00224490209552114
  102. ^ Berenbaum, Sheri A.; Blakemore, Judith East. Owen; Beltz, Adriene M. (2011-05-27). "A Role for Biology in Gender-Related Behavior". Sex Roles. Springer Science and Business Media LLC. 64 (eleven–12): 804–825. doi:10.1007/s11199-011-9990-eight. ISSN 0360-0025. S2CID 145689071.
  103. ^ King, Robert C. (2012). A dictionary of genetics (8th ed.). Oxford [u.a.]: Oxford Univ. Printing. ISBN9780199766444. [ page needed ]
  104. ^ Zirkle, Conrad (1946). "The discovery of sexual activity-influenced, sexual activity express and sex-linked heredity". In Montagu, Ashley (ed.). Studies in the history of science and learning offered in homage to George Sarton on the occasion of his sixtieth birthday. New York: Schuman. pp. 167–194. OCLC 621493829.
  105. ^ a b Rex R.C; Stansfield W.D. & Mulligan P.K. 2006. A dictionary of genetics. 7th ed, Oxford University Press. ISBN 0-nineteen-530761-5[ page needed ]
  106. ^ a b Sánchez, Francisco J.; Vilain, Eric (2010). "Genes and encephalon sexual practice differences". Sex Differences in the Man Encephalon, their Underpinnings and Implications. Progress in Encephalon Research. Vol. 186. pp. 64–76. doi:10.1016/B978-0-444-53630-iii.00005-1. ISBN978-0-444-53630-three. PMID 21094886.
  107. ^ a b Margaret M. McCarthy; Anthony P. Auger; Tracy L. Bale; Geert J. De Vries; Gregory A. Dunn; Nancy Thousand. Forger; Elaine K. Murray; Bridget M. Nugent; Jaclyn Thousand. Schwarz; Melinda Due east. Wilson (14 October 2009). "The Epigenetics of Sex Differences in the Encephalon". J. Neurosci. (Symposium). 29 (41): 12815–12823. doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3331-09.2009. PMC2788155. PMID 19828794.
  108. ^ Eliot, Lise; Ahmed, Adnan; Khan, Hiba; Patel, Julie (2021-06-01). "Dump the "dimorphism": Comprehensive synthesis of human brain studies reveals few male-female differences beyond size". Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews. 125: 667–697. doi:ten.1016/j.neubiorev.2021.02.026. ISSN 0149-7634. PMID 33621637.
  109. ^ Cahill L (June 2006). "Why sex matters for neuroscience". Nature Reviews. Neuroscience. seven (6): 477–84. doi:10.1038/nrn1909. PMID 16688123. S2CID 10847255.
  110. ^ Ruigrok AN, Salimi-Khorshidi Chiliad, Lai MC, Baron-Cohen S, Lombardo MV, Tait RJ, Suckling J (February 2014). "A meta-analysis of sex activity differences in man brain structure". Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews (Meta-analysis). 39: 34–l. doi:x.1016/j.neubiorev.2013.12.004. PMC3969295. PMID 24374381.
  111. ^ Rudman, Fifty. A., Glick, P. (2008). The social psychology of gender: how power and intimacy shape gender relations. New York: Guilford Printing.
  112. ^ Rudman, L. A., Glick, P. (2008). The social psychology of gender: how ability and intimacy shape gender relations. New York: Guilford Printing.
  113. ^ Rudman, L. A., Glick, P. (2008). The social psychology of gender: how ability and intimacy shape gender relations. New York: Guilford Printing.
  114. ^ Symons, Donald (1979). The Evolution of Human Sexuality. Oxford New York: Oxford Academy Press. ISBN978-0-19-502907-9. OCLC 729246375. [ folio needed ]
  115. ^ Fisher, Maryanne 50.; Garcia, Justin R.; Chang, Rosemarie Sokol, eds. (2013-02-27). Evolution's Empress. Oxford Academy Press. doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199892747.001.0001. ISBN978-0-19-989274-7. [ page needed ]

External links [edit]

  • List of total text books and articles on the topic of psychology of gender

ricesomill00.blogspot.com

Source: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sex_differences_in_psychology

0 Response to "How Do Affect and Empathy Function in Environmental Art?"

Post a Comment

Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)

Iklan Atas Artikel

Iklan Tengah Artikel 1

Iklan Tengah Artikel 2

Iklan Bawah Artikel